One story is very familiar throughout history.
The child was born in poverty. His parents worked hard, but never seemed to escape the grip. The child saw how there were those who were far better off and took advantage of those like his parents. Before long as the child becomes a man, he understands that what has given his parents grief is not an individual but a system.
When he discovers this, he pledges to do something about it. Whether through the military, through public service or other means, he gathers an understanding of how the system operates. He will fulfil his pledge. He will make a change and ensure that what he suffered as a child will never happen to anyone else again.
Finally, after years of toil and service, working through the ranks, climbing the ladder, he finally reaches a position where he believes he can make real and lasting change. Maybe he was voted to the position, perhaps he was selected to give advice, maybe his expertise made him the key reference point for the key decisions. What he hasn’t paid attention to, however, is that in his pursuit of the information on the system and his zeal to get his hands on power, some of his own principles have become somewhat corrupted. He leans in on ways to work the system, which would not be considered as wholly ethical. He justifies these compromises because of the greater good.
Yet now in the position to make decisions to make the changes, he is challenged with what that might cost. What it might cost especially in terms of his own position and ability to influence. He reasons that as he’s in the best position to effect change, everything has to be done to ensure he retains that position. Even if that means others are oppressed as a result.
Meanwhile, there is a different story that has only been told once, for it is only a story belonging to one person.
From His position of greatness, He took on the form of a servant. He did not climb any career ladders or rise through the ranks. He remained in relative obscurity for the majority of His time on earth. When He accepted the call to service, He served obediently, operating in a way that acknowledged the prevailing oppressive system, but understanding that the lasting change to be looked for could not come from this earth. He did not seek great military or political position. Even His teaching influence did not reach the religious centre of his day. His counter-cultural approach upset the status quo to such an extent that they crucified Him. They crucified Him even though His message was peace. They crucified Him even though His teaching looked to set people free. They crucified Him even though what He offered was not about manipulating the system, but showing a better way.
They crucified Him, but not even death could hold Him. And the message to set people free was spread even more afterwards.
Which story will you be a part of?
(Photo by Dan Stark on Unsplash)
For His Name’s Sake
Shalom
C. L. J. Dryden
Life With CD 